Error and fraud in R&D tax credits

 To look at this, this HMRC report, from 2023, looked at claims in 2020-21.  They say that there has been reforms since then.  Here are the findings from " based on 97% of cases in the MREP with a finalised compliance audit" : 

As the final row shows, 16.7% of claims, representing over £1b are error and fraud.  

An updated table, published in October 2024,  gives more current data, based on estimates

And some examples of this in action are by Dan Neidle, here for example on claiming R&D tax credits from footballer wages.

Returning to the 2023, report, some comments from the report

Analysis of the MREP shows that around half of all claims, by volume, contained at least some element of non-compliance. HMRC found fraud indicators in fewer than 10% of claims examined in the random enquiry programme and these claims accounted for less than 5% of the total value claimed. To be classified as fraud, a caseworker needs to have found evidence that the claimant deliberately set out to misrepresent their circumstances to get money to which they were not entitled.

This indicates that the majority of non-compliance is down to other behaviours. As with other regimes, the term ‘non-compliance’ or ‘error and fraud’ encapsulates this full range of behaviours, from mistakes and failure to take reasonable care through to deliberate non-compliance.

In claims where expenditure was over £1 million, around 75% of claims were fully compliant. In smaller claims the percentage of claims being fully compliant was lower, at between 35% and 64%.

As the size of expenditure decreases, the value of non-compliance expressed as a percentage of the value of the claim increases. In the smallest claims where expenditure was less than £10,000, over 75% of the value of the claim was non-compliant. 

The end of rent sharing in the UK

 Bell, Brian, Bukowski, Pawel & Machin, Stephen (2024) The decline in rent sharing. Labor Economics, 42(3), 683 - 716. https://doi.org/10.1086/724570, links here and working paper here study the extent to which wages are correlated with UK company profits/rents.  Using industry and company data and controlling for exogeneity etc. they find a consistent picture, summarised in their Figure 3, working paper version, below

Before 1999, the central estiamte was that wages were marked up by around 25% of firm value added and 7% of  profits.  After 1999 that figure is below 10% and 1% respectively and insignificantly different from zero.  Similar results are obtained for EU industries using industry level data.  

CPI, RPI and CPIH, summary of differences

 

The final table in Consumer Price Indices, Technical Manual, 2019

https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/inflationandpriceindices/methodologies/consumerpricesindicestechnicalmanual2019

Bank of England December Rate decision: 5-4 for a cut from 4% to 3.75%

 Some points. 

1. Self on the Today programme, Radio 4 

The interview starts at 1:20:11 :

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m002nhxx

2. A feature of the BoE minutes that caught my eye:

In 5th November, they said "The MPC sets monetary policy to meet the 2% inflation target,"

Today they said 

"19.

The Monetary Policy Committee’s job is to ensure that CPI inflation falls all the way back to the 2% target and stays there."

This is an interesting addition I think, trying to signal to the market that drifting along at above 2% is not what they want to do.

Big numbers and thinking about GDP

 UK GDP is about £2.2 trillion. A basis point is defined as: 1bp is 0.0001 = 1/100th of 1%.  

1. So a basis point of GDP, 0.01% of GDP, is 2,200*10^9 * 1*10^-4=£220m.  That's about half the cost of a medium size hospital.

2. Ten basis points, 0.1% of GDP is therefore £2.2billion. 

3. with around 30m households GDP is around £70,000 per household, so 0.1% of GDP is around £70 per household. 

My time on the MPC and monetary policy at Covid and after

I was asked by the IIMR to talk about my time on the MPC and how I reacted to the pandemic and subsequent inflation.  The video (18 mins) is here.  

The blurb says: 

Gain an insight into the thinking behind the Monetary Policy Committee decisions during the Covid crisis from the personal reflections of Jonathan Haskel, who was an external member at the time. From the second session of the 2025 IIMR Monetary Conference 'Why were so many economists wrong about inflation in the early 2020s?' that was held at the University of Buckingham on November 12th, 2025.

The UK social security system: who "puts in" and who "gets out"?

 https://ifs.org.uk/news/more-nine-ten-individuals-pay-more-taxes-they-receive-social-security-over-their-lifetime?utm_source=chatgpt.com

I am late to this IFS report "Redistribution from a Lifetime Perspective,

"

In a single year, 64% of individuals in the UK pay more in taxes than they receive in social security. New analysis, ...shows that extending the period of analysis from a single year to an entire lifetime increases the percentage who pay more in taxes than they receive in social security to 93%."

and they say

The Labour government’s expansion of in- and out-of-work benefits between 1999 and 2002 was less well targeted towards the lifetime poor than the snapshot poor. The reason is that many of the poorest individuals over the lifetime are not poor in all periods of life.

 

Investment and uncertainty

 Uncertainty holds back business investment: see Brexit for example.  The November Bank of England Monetary Policy Report, p.20, shows this chart: 

and says

"Measures of business confidence have recovered a little over recent months but many remain

weak, and contacts of the Bank’s Agents note that investment intentions are subdued (ASBC

– November 2025 and Chart 1.8). Contacts report that weak demand and elevated

uncertainty, including ahead of the Autumn Budget, may be causing firms to delay investment.

Consistent with that, the proportion of respondents to recent DMP Surveys reporting that the

overall level of uncertainty facing their businesses is high or very high has been around its

highest level since end-2022."

What has happened to NHS capital per worker?

 1. a New report "From Diagnosis to Delivery" by Allas et al has, on p.45 some information.

2. The figure is a figure relative to other countries. I don't put much store by that, what matters is how productive we are with the capital not how much we are spending.

3. The figure below says NHS capital per worker has fallen by 36% in real terms since 2010. i think this is a capital stock per worker figure.

4. The ONS data tell a different story.  That is capital services per worker.  If you go to 

https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/economicoutputandproductivity/publicservicesproductivity/datasets/publicserviceproductivityestimateshealthcareengland

you can download the 1996-2023 data

from which you get that since 1996 capital has grown 7.6% faster than labour, but from 2010, -20%.  So more capital per worker over the whole period. 

The locus of R&D is moving to the information and software industries

 From the technical appendix to Draghi report, p.234.